For years, we watched Silicon Valley executives perform elaborate corporate theater about “values” and “belonging” and “bringing your whole self to work.” If you were skeptical that any of that was real, well, congrats.

Aaron Zamost, a longtime tech communications exec, has a piece in the NY Times that should be required reading for anyone trying to understand the tech industry’s sudden, conspicuous rightward lurch. His argument is refreshingly blunt: this isn’t about ideology. It never was. It’s about leverage.

There are many theories about Silicon Valley’s swift, and very conspicuous, rightward turn. Tech leaders course-corrected from an overly permissive era. The Trump administration demands fealty in exchange for critical regulatory favors. Mr. Trump’s re-election reshaped the national climate and reoriented the values of tech leadership.

Each of these explanations is convenient, but none are correct. I’ve worked in tech for 20 years, across both Big Tech and venture-backed start-ups, and I can tell you the truth is much more mundane. Silicon Valley’s chief executives have always been driven by economics, not ideology. As Michael Corleone put it: It’s not personal — it’s strictly business.

  • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    And yet they act surprised when we resist coming in.

    Fully remote my job is ok, shit pay but alright conditions. Now they move the office 10x further away and want me in twice a month saying “we feel this is reasonable”. I am yet to see any benefit from us having this new office, I have got less work done in the office in the past 12 months combined than I have done in the past 24 hours at home.