hoch@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 8 hours agoMore code = more betterlemmy.worldimagemessage-square23fedilinkarrow-up1177arrow-down13
arrow-up1174arrow-down1imageMore code = more betterlemmy.worldhoch@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 8 hours agomessage-square23fedilink
minus-squareferric_carcinization@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·4 hours agoI don’t know what I was thinking. But, if you borrow C’s semantics, you are allowed to “optimize” away side-effect-less loops, even if they would never terminate. But that would require the random method to be pure.
I don’t know what I was thinking.
But, if you borrow C’s semantics, you are allowed to “optimize” away side-effect-less loops, even if they would never terminate. But that would require the random method to be pure.