hoch@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 8 hours agoMore code = more betterlemmy.worldimagemessage-square23fedilinkarrow-up1177arrow-down13
arrow-up1174arrow-down1imageMore code = more betterlemmy.worldhoch@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 8 hours agomessage-square23fedilink
minus-squarepineapple@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·4 hours agoStill a mess to read though, anyone revewing the code will be like wtf?
minus-squareferric_carcinization@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 hours agoYou could do a lot worse. If the type of i was an object, you could overload the negation operation to have side-effects for the third snippet, for example.
Still a mess to read though, anyone revewing the code will be like wtf?
You could do a lot worse. If the type of
iwas an object, you could overload the negation operation to have side-effects for the third snippet, for example.