• spare_muppets@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    It doesn’t matter what color your skin is, what your name is, or what your religion is. Air Canada will still treat you like shit.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Until last year I’d never even heard of Air Canada, and now every time anybody mentions them all I hear is how terrible they are.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I remember when British Airways used to actually be posh. If you were flying with BA you’d made it.

          • SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Well despite how far it’s fallen, it’s still up on Air Canada. Their business model is running flights as a cover for taking as much government funding as they can get.

            When I was still living in Canada and my now wife was here in the UK, we discovered that booking with Air Canada was $100-$300 cheaper in the UK than in Canada.

  • Squeak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    The title is a bit clickbaity. He wasn’t stopped from boarding, he had to go through additional security checks. He claims he was told he had to go through the checks because his name was Mohammad… although that’s just him saying that.

    I live in UK and I’d say around 50% of the flights I’ve taken to/from US I’ve been pulled aside for extra checks. Many times both on the way out and way back for a 100% check rate on that single trip.

    If they did actually say it was due to his name being Mohammad then yeah that’s really bad, but this sounds like they’re making something of nothing. And at no point was he stopped from boarding.

    • geolaw@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      They could have done it because of his name, but just not admitted it, or given no reason at all. Systemic racism is hard to prove, which means it can be remarkably persistent

      • InvertedParallax@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        As someone who looks exactly like the people they should stop and who flew our of Boston after 9/11, I doubt it, I haven’t had much more than a few shabby things and they go through all my electronics.

        Best guess he rolled a 1 when it came to random searches and he reacted poorly.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          he reacted poorly

          He’s an MP. Of course he acted poorly, none of them have any kind of grace under pressure. The way he complained about it in the House is rather telling, he was complaining mostly that it was done to him even though he was an MP not that it was done to him at all.

          Who cares if it happens to the plebs but not the people like him.

          That said he’s only the MP for Bradford which a bit like being the MP for a nuclear waste dump, if the nuclear waste dump was a particularly unattractive one.

            • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              No doubt Labour upper echelons will get involved and tell him not to cause an international incident thank you very much.

              Generally Labour are ok, but this guy just seems to be an utter pillock with a chip on its shoulder.

              • kayjay@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                1 year ago

                Sources say it’s of Hindi origin, but when I actually checked the statistics, it says there’s only 130 people in India with the name, while there’s ~56 million in China. So it seems to be mostly a Chinese name. Although further googling seems to indicate that’s the Chinese name for “Mrs.”… so it might be that these sources are reading the title field as the first name, lol.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          And Smith is the most common last name. So statistically speaking most people are called Maria Smith

          • blindsight@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Only in the US. Internationally, the most common last name is Wang:

            Wang is a patronymic (ancestral) name that means “king” in Mandarin, and it’s shared by more than 92 million people in China, making it the most popular last name in the world. The reason it’s so populous today may have a lot to do with the fact that many royal families changed their name to Wang when their kingdoms fell under the first Qin dynasty emperor. This was both to preserve their status and protect themselves from assassination.
            Source

            So Mohammed Wang is the most common name in the world.

  • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It was completely unacceptable for a member of this house human being to be treated in this way.

    In absolutely no context does the name your parents gave you correlate to whether or not you’re a terrorist.

    • blindsight@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the problem is terrorist watch lists based only on first/last name combos. If you have a common name, particularly a male Middle Eastern name, then your name is likely shared by someone on a terrorism watch list.

      The problem is that means these people are harassed every time they try to travel. We need at least one other piece of identifying information, not just first/last, so it’s quick to exclude all the false positives.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    An MP was stopped from boarding a flight to Canada with other members of parliament “because his name was Mohammad”, the Commons heard on Monday.

    Mohammad Yasin, Labour’s MP for Bedford, was due to fly to Canada with other MPs from the Commons levelling up, housing and communities committee when he was delayed for questioning “for a considerable period” at airports in both countries last week.

    Clive Betts, the chair of the committee, said the incident was unacceptable because of its “racist and Islamophobic nature”, and that he would write to the Canadian high commissioner in the UK.

    Yasin then underwent similar questioning from officials on his return trip to the UK, MPs were told.

    On return at Toronto airport on the way back, he was again challenged and got on his flight with the assistance of my consul general, who was very helpful.”

    The deputy speaker Roger Gale replied: “I am sure that the whole house will share the dismay at the treatment of the member for Bedford.


    The original article contains 443 words, the summary contains 169 words. Saved 62%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!