I want to transfer 80 TB of data to another locatio . I already have the drives for it. The idea is to copy everything to it, fly it to the target and use or copy the data on/to the server.

What filesystem would you use and would you use a raid configuration? Currently I lean towards 8 single disk filesystems on the 10 TB drives with ext4, because it is simple. I considered ZFS because of the possiblity to scrub at the target destination and/or pool all drives. But ZFS may not be available at the target.

There is btrfs which should be available everywhere because it is in mainline linux and ZFS is not. But from my knowledge btrfs would require lvm to pool disks together like zfs can do natively.

Pooling the drives would also be a problem if one disk gets lost during transit. If I have everything on 8 single disks at least the remaining data can be used at the target and they only have to wait for the missing data.

I like to read about your opinions or practical experience with similar challanges.

  • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    Either way, traveling with that much spinning rust there is always a good chance for bit-flips or damage.

    What? Lol no. They’ll travel fine.

      • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        24 hours ago

        You kids think HDDs just failed daily or something. I flew all over the place with a laptop with an HDD for years, as did many others. It’ll be fine. Especially since it’s unlikely they would be using the drives while traveling.

        • mko@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          19 hours ago

          From a position of handling corporate data on a daily basis, I am pretty confident that data integrity is top of mind.

          • poinck@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            12 hours ago

            I agree with both of you. Somehow I don’t worry about the drive in my laptop but 80 TB of scientific data is another thing, and I want to make sure it is the same data when it arrives.

    • frongt@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Really, then why is there an explicit SMART conveyance test?

      It’s to test for damage that may have occurred during shipping.

        • frongt@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Often enough that there’s a test designed to detect it specifically. If you want hard data you’ll have to find it on your own, I don’t have any handy.

          • poinck@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            12 hours ago

            this is scientific data.

            Funfact, I recently did a scrub on my offline backup drive of my work PC. It correct around 250 errors. I wouldn’t have noticed any problems if I had used ext4 instead of btrfs.