• woelkchen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    The only infrastructure I’m using is the bit of Javascript and HTML

    If Photopea was so simple, you could just download the necessary parts and self-host.

    This won’t work because there is actual server-side code running, meaning you’re hogging someone else’s resources to do your commercial-grade tasks.

    • percent@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      The image processing happens locally in the web browser.

      Not to imply that hosting the static assets to power that (JS and WebAssembly binaries) is free, but it’s definitely much cheaper than the compute resources that would be required to do the heavy lifting server-side.

      (Still worth paying for or allowing ads though. Photopea clearly took a lot of work to build)

      • woelkchen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        The completely insane claim was “The only infrastructure I’m using is the bit of Javascript and HTML”, meaning one could just save the page and run it fully locally.

        This is of course BS.

    • lichtmetzger@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      This won’t work because there is actual server-side code running

      That is not true! You can figure that out for yourself - open up the site, disconnect your internet and resize/crop some images. It will do it just fine, because all of that code runs in your own browser.