• NoodlePoint@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    The left is pretty much splintered into different types of ideologies, levels of hostility towards conservatism, and having wildly different objectives to accomplish, so they could not agree with each other and thus rarely ever win over the right.

    The right-wingers? They have unanimous hatred towards the left and seemingly united until once they defeat the left, they’ll fight and kill each other as to who gets the biggest slice of the pie.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      This is how I feel about Jeremy Corbyn in the UK and his stupidly named political party that will go nowhere.

      Obstensively he is fairly radically left wing, he’s just not radically in favour of actually doing anything. Basically he sits on the sidelines and mutters about genocide being bad (hot take I know) but otherwise just sits there. The only reason he’s considered a threat is because his party might actually take votes away from labour but if he won an election nothing would change.

      Short of an actual uprising against the corporate elite nothing is going to improve. You can certainly not rely on politicians to be your saviours. That’s true globally not just in the US in the UK.

    • bankimu@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I am unsure about that.

      Although I am not exactly right-winger. I do not believe there is a God, for example.

      Long ago - at least that is how it seems now - “right-wingers” were laughably and infuriatingly wrong. They tried pushing evolution in schools. They were against gay rights. And so on.

      Now I find that it’s the “left-wingers” who are laughably and infuriatingly wrong. They have even managed to malleate how science is defined socially. And science is not the only example - they’ve lost their minds in crime, immigration, sexuality, racism - everything - and they changed (or tried to change) all definitions. I will not go into any examples because it always starts a debate. But I will say this. If we think math is a “white supremacist construct”, then there is something that has gone very, very wrong.

      • PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I used to be a scientist and I’m a science teacher now, and science is 100% a social construct. I could go through examples of how our modern interpretation of science is based on western philosophy that is a few thousand years younger than science itself as a practice, and how this limits the scope of modern science in a materially significant way. I could go into other examples too. But you really should just go watch Dr.Fatima’s two videos “Gravity is a Social Construct, and That’s Okay”, and “Astronomy has a Colonialism Problem” on YouTube, because she does the most phenomenal exploration of the topic, and I could only (poorly) approximate the quality of her work here.