• muhyb@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          13 hours ago

          To be fair, I don’t know any benchmark for this comparison. But I just tried a relatively big file with both of them. Opening part is not really noticeable, but fast-forwarding is much better and slicker in mpv. In VLC it looks like it’s jumping between scenes, in mpv you actually see the motion of it’s getting fast-forward.

          • flux@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Yeah, with mpv you can even hold the jump 10/60 sec forward/backward button pressed and the frames just fly in the screen. Vlc seeking is really slow in comparison.

            • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              and while we are at that, MPV also has a working reverse play implementation (though that’s like a slideshow), and it can very seamlessly do frame by frame playback, the hotkey of which just does normal playback perfectly while it’s long pressed

    • nasi_goreng@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      My laptop from 2014 significantly loads .ts video faster on MPV than VLC.

      VLC even stuck on video seeking for a few seconds.