• Dzso@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Russian and Chinese state media are spending an “eyewatering” £8bn a year, compared with the World Service’s £400m budget.

    I mean, yeah, that’s kind of concerning. The reality is, whoever invests the most in propaganda is going to win.

    • marathon@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      No organization was spending more on foreign influence and media reportage than USAid. So of course the UK wants to fill the void. They’re the voice of Anglo Saxony! They don’t speak for this anglo-saxon (by heritage). /s

    • yunxiaoli@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      They’re including the entirety of China’s media budget.

      While I agree things like npr, pbs, and local newspapers are propaganda, you guys typically don’t. So it’s silly to compare the two like that.

      It’s like saying the entirety of the UK’s tv license fee is just for state run propaganda; and that’s not fair, channel 4 exists and works against UK state propaganda.