Magnetic_dud@discuss.tchncs.de to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 16 days agoDevelopers: "Yes, the users love cluttered homes, just put everything there and ignore guidelines"discuss.tchncs.deexternal-linkmessage-square69fedilinkarrow-up1456arrow-down115file-text
arrow-up1441arrow-down1external-linkDevelopers: "Yes, the users love cluttered homes, just put everything there and ignore guidelines"discuss.tchncs.deMagnetic_dud@discuss.tchncs.de to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 16 days agomessage-square69fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareMonkderVierte@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·16 days agoSame. I think it would be more friendly for end-users too.
minus-squareILikeBoobies@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·16 days agoJust sounds messy and impractical
minus-squareMonkderVierte@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-215 days agoWell, tree-based as we know it, is messy. Can’t have a file that belongs to two places. Next time you look for it, you climb the tree, only to not find it in the other place the file belongs to.
minus-squarewhaleross@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·15 days agoIn my mind you could use it as your regular hierarchical file system, but the hierarchies are dynamic to your associations or needs.
Same. I think it would be more friendly for end-users too.
Just sounds messy and impractical
Well, tree-based as we know it, is messy. Can’t have a file that belongs to two places. Next time you look for it, you climb the tree, only to not find it in the other place the file belongs to.
In my mind you could use it as your regular hierarchical file system, but the hierarchies are dynamic to your associations or needs.