Note I did not buy any food for myself.

To head off questions:

  1. No, I couldn’t cook for her. I’m suffering from a long-term illness where I can’t eat solid foods and am extremely smell sensitive. My wife is at a funeral, so I had to order food.

  2. She’s extremely picky and refused to let me order anything but pizza.

  3. We live outside of town, in a not very big town, with very few pizza delivery options, and they’re all at least this expensive.

  4. No, I didn’t also have to buy her the cheesy bread or the second topping or the sauces, but it’s nice to get my daughter a treat and that is no excuse for the order being that expensive.

  5. We’re in Indiana, so this should be ludicrous in terms of pricing. This used to be the pricing I would expect when we lived in L.A. and ordered from a good local place rather than a chain.

Edit: Turns out what I should have been infuriated about is people repeatedly telling me to get takeout and having to repeatedly explain why that wasn’t an option, having people not believe I’m sick, and being repeatedly berated for not magically knowing food coupons exist on the internet when I never order food on the internet. Oh right, and also being a bad parent for not forcing food my daughter doesn’t like down her throat or starving her if she won’t eat it.

By the way, I have another thing to be infuriated about. A huge storm came in and this happened to our trees. I assume I will start being berated for not cutting them down before that happened, but because I have no power or internet at home and have to go to the library to post, your further posts telling me what an idiot I am and how I’m an awful parent and how I’m not really sick will take me a while to read. Sorry to ruin your day. Maybe you’ll find someone else to treat like shit.

Anyway, have fun telling me I’m the worst person on Lemmy, just don’t expect a quick reply.

Oh, and do tell me how stupid I am for not knowing that people who clear up and fix such damage have coupons on their website.

  • Rhaedas@fedia.io
    16·
    5 months ago

    The issue isn’t the prices. It’s that the prices go up but income doesn’t. Get out the pitchforks, but let’s go after the real villains.

    • Wrench@lemmy.worldEnglish
      10·
      5 months ago

      And the timespan of the increased cost of everything.

      Since the pandemic, construction ply more than tripled in price and isn’t going down.

      That’s insane. Income can’t keep up with that.

      • ChexMax@lemmy.worldEnglish
        1·
        5 months ago

        What am I missing about your point?

        Looks like income dropped following 2020 and hasn’t returned yet… am I miss reading?

        • iopq@lemmy.worldEnglish
          3·
          5 months ago

          During the shutdowns there’s a compositional effect of lower wage workers losing their jobs.

          I’m talking about the difference from 2019 to now, people are making more money even accounting for inflation

      • Rhaedas@fedia.io
        1·
        5 months ago

        Curious what shift there has been in full time/part time numbers. Full time wages going up is great for those who are experiencing it, but if there are less actual full timers, is that an improvement?

        The art of a good statistician is to make sure what their numbers are saying is an actual reflection of reality. I’m not saying this graph is falsified, I don’t know. But numbers can be made to say anything. I learned this years ago in arguments about what “unemployment” meant. It’s much more complex than a single number, but a single number is used in the media because it’s easier to paint the picture wanted.

          • Rhaedas@fedia.io
            2·
            5 months ago

            Yes, definitely increased some. Where’s the rest of the data, such as part time or unemployed, or even population growth? Like I said, a single number means not so much without context. But it’s an impressive graph.

            • iopq@lemmy.worldEnglish
              11·
              5 months ago

              Unemployment is very low

              Not really an improvement from 2019, but basically has been around that 4% value for a while

              In fact, president Biden noted “unemployment has been at or below 4% for 30 months—the longest stretch in 50 years.”

              • Rhaedas@fedia.io
                2·
                5 months ago

                Yes, there is a low unemployment number. As with the rest, you haven’t validated that it’s a good measure of the current state of things. It’s arguably never been.