🙄

    • TheYang@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Depends.

      If he thinks Twitter is irreperably dying, this may be a way, in which he can get out of repaying the loans he used to (partially) fund the buyout of twitter.

        • TheYang@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          depends how the loans worked.
          I was assuming his majority shares of X (ex Twitter) collateral.
          And that that he could just go “yeah, go on, collect on your collateral, I don’t mind”, because it’s not worth anything anymore.

          But admittedly I have no Idea how the contracts were drawn up, if this is possible and if his other money would be available to collect on.

      • agentsquirrel@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        If you’re thinking this an “artist formerly known as Prince” sort of thing where Prince got out of a contract, I’m sure all the debt holders have the proper legal verbiage to have agreements remain valid in the event of a name change.

      • milkjug@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        At some point some creditor should be desperate enough to do a margin call, since the loan collateral is next to worthless.