I was on Ubuntu for a year. No major issues, although I used the interim releases, which are supposed to be less solid than LTS. Then, a couple of months ago, I decided to switch to Fedora, just out of curiosity. Many people stated how Fedora is rock solid, Fedora is the new Ubuntu, etc. First some rpmfussion updates broke mesa, then the ostree update broke Flatpak, and recently there was a broken kernel 6.3.11 update that affected some AMD users. A few days ago, I updated my kernel to 6.3.12, and I got frequent freezes on boot. Other users are also reporting such issues. So now I boot with an older kernel. Which is not optimal. There is no LTS kernel on Fedora, the old kernel version doesn’t receive security updates. Was it always like that, or it’s an unusual bad phase.

  • Fredol@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    You want an honest answer? Fedora was never that great to begin with and went down quite a bit in quality since the whole patent debacle. I had to switch distros when Mesa was constantly breaking. Also, untested kernel updates would remove HDMI audio (and despite a fix being available they waited a crazy long time to push it) among many other things

    Tumbleweed is just plain better.

    • Kekin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think it’s worth noting that Tumbleweed also has the Mesa/codecs situation, where if you want the codecs you have to enable the Packman repo and install mesa from there, and when there’s an update for mesa you have to wait for the update on Packman repo, otherwise you get some conflicts when trying to update. Though packman usually updates quick enough so it’s usually not an issue but it can be a bit weird the first time you see it.

      Aside from that yeah, Tumbleweed is great. Though i’m currently running Fedora Kinoite and overall I’ve been happy with it, but I would probably go back to Tumbleweed if something were to happen.

    • DigDoug@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Fedora was never that great to begin with

      I always just found it to be really, really, ridiculously slow. I swear DNF might rival Windows in terms of update slowness and it seems to permeate the whole system.

  • StrangeAstronomer@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Rock solid on my 11-yo laptop that has been running fedora and updated every 6 months since I bought it in 2012.

    I’ve always updated late in the fedora cycle - maybe that’s the go.

    • Shertson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I’ve been running Fedora since the first Fedora Core release. Only ever had an issue once, back on FC4 but was easily fixed. My current laptop is 8 years old and is solid. Only issue is rotating it causes airplane mode to turn on, so I don’t rotate it.

  • albsen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m using fedora as my work system, because I have a relatively new laptop that needs the new kernels. Haven’t experienced anything you’re describing. Are you on fedora regular or on sliverblue (the immutable version)? If you’re having issues running the newest kernel, follow the fedora documented way to build and run your own. I did just that when needed a prerelease kernel and it worked out fine. I usually upgrade to a new release by the end of the cycle, so that the new version had 6 months to mature. I never immediately upgrade.

  • MyNameIsRichard@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Back in my distro-hopping days, I found it be unstable both when updating and in day-to-day use. Updates broke it and applications regularly crashed.

  • Krtek@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Also on AMD APU hardware, I was a while on Kubuntu with 5.15 as 5.16 and 5.17 had pretty frequent regressions regarding s0ix, but it was fine afterwards. Until now, though 6.3.12 seems to be somewhat stable again

  • Secret300@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve been using fedora since 32 and I’d say this is a bad phase. I have heard time and time again that opensuse is more stable tho

  • Crunkle_Foreskin@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fedora 30 - 36 were phenomenal releases and I mostly used them, recommended them elsewhere.

    I had to start using the Spins because the default GNOME desktop is just becoming unusable. Stripping functionality to make it prettier, not fixing longstanding issues.

    Then Fedora had that kerfuffle with the licensing issues with codecs, and I couldn’t play a certain type of HEVC video that the vast majority of my video library is encoded in.

    Then, more recently, I had issues with Python in their repos. That was the last straw. I’ll definitely check it out again in a few years to see if they’ve fixed a lot of these problems, but I wouldn’t recommend the distro in its current state.

  • PlexSheep@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I run fedora since some months on my Framework laptop, I suspect my SSD is making some issues. It was really bad when I was on arch and fedora is pretty okay? I still goz a system freeze (no tty even) yesterday.