I have an old Subnotebook (at least 10 years old I think) which runs Windows 7 atm. I would like to run Linux on it. I‘m a Linux noob, but would like to try and learn a few things. Any recommendations?

  • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have successfully run Arch with Openbox as WM on machines even older than that. Arch has a learning curve, though.

    • ArmoredGoat@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      And therefore it should not be recommended to Linux beginners… It is not a beginner distro.

      • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There is no such thing as a “beginner distro”. There are distros that need little to no intelligence to set up and maintain. Arch needs you to read and follow instructions. It is a myth that it is impossible for beginners to use Arch. There are several good installations instructions in the wiki, select one and follow it till the end.

        There are also plenty of Arch derivates that preconfigure the system for you.

        • Ulu-Mulu-no-die@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          There are distros that need little to no intelligence to set up and maintain

          It’s not a matter of intelligence but prior knowledge, Arch wiki is the best thing ever for everyone, even if you don’t use Arch, BUT you need some Linux knowledge - at least Linux “lingo” - to be able to understand it.

          That’s something a Linux newbie doesn’t have yet, exactly the reason why Arch is not recommended for newbies.

        • NotAPenguin@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re way too deep in the linux world lol.

          There are distros that need little to no intelligence to set up and maintain.

          One might call that… suited for beginners.

          • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’re way too deep in the linux world

            Yep.

            beginners

            Beginners need to learn anyways, why not skip the “not-for-beginners stuff” and go all in? :)

            • Ulu-Mulu-no-die@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Overwhelming beginners with more than they can chew is not the best way to welcome them to Linux, giving them the chance to learn a bit at a time is instead.

            • MyNameIsRichard@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Beginners need to learn anyways, why not skip the “not-for-beginners stuff” and go all in?

              Because most people will likely want something that works out of the box so they can learn over time

        • ArmoredGoat@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I beg to differ and say, even when the Arch wiki is a great source of knowledge, setting up own Arch system and maintaining it requires keeping on track with updates, to understand what is wrong with your system to look up the right keywords and so on. In my opinion it is better to stay on a stable, periodically released distro with tested repos like Debian, Mint or Ubuntu at first. Afterwards, you can still switch to Arch.