gobbling871@lemmy.world to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agoOracle: Keep Linux Open and Free—We Can’t Afford Not Towww.oracle.comexternal-linkmessage-square16fedilinkarrow-up1130arrow-down18file-textcross-posted to: foss@beehaw.orglinux@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1122arrow-down1external-linkOracle: Keep Linux Open and Free—We Can’t Afford Not Towww.oracle.comgobbling871@lemmy.world to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square16fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: foss@beehaw.orglinux@lemmy.ml
minus-squareRaphael@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up43arrow-down3·1 year agoEven ORACLE is calling out Red Hat. Who’s next, Apple? Currently testing Debian in a VM, I have lots of files so I need to set everything straight before I switch.
minus-squareMigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·1 year agoI suppose Apple uses Linux in some of their servers, so maybe. But their desktop product is Darwin so I don’t think that’s getting any votes
minus-squareRaphael@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down1·1 year agoTheir desktop product is a stolen BSD.
minus-squareMigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoIndeed, but with that kind of licensing there’s nothing stopping them. We already found limitations of GPL with RedHat, I think all of these licenses need an overhaul
Even ORACLE is calling out Red Hat.
Who’s next, Apple?
Currently testing Debian in a VM, I have lots of files so I need to set everything straight before I switch.
I suppose Apple uses Linux in some of their servers, so maybe. But their desktop product is Darwin so I don’t think that’s getting any votes
Their desktop product is a stolen BSD.
Indeed, but with that kind of licensing there’s nothing stopping them. We already found limitations of GPL with RedHat, I think all of these licenses need an overhaul