• Storksforlegs@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    You make a lot of excellent points, but I think the main issue of contention is just using copyrighted work to train generative AI without the author’s permission regardless.

    If they did ask permission, there would be no problem. But an author or artist should be given the choice if their work is going to be used to train an AI.

    • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the main issue of contention is just using copyrighted work to train generative AI without the author’s permission regardless.

      You must define that in legal terms. This is a lawsuit, after all. It’s not illegal to “just use” copyrighted work. The words “generative AI” are not in a federal or state bill anywhere in the US.

      They can have an “issue of contention” all they want, but if they can’t prove anything legally, they have nothing.