No, there’s a lot of evidence of real crimes. I’m saying don’t dilute them with bullshit

Edit: To be pedantic about the analogy, what I’m saying is that dragons aren’t real (as irl), not that dragons are puppies. I’m not sure how you put that together.

Why stop there? Surely we can think of some even worse crimes to pin on them. Since the crimes we have actual evidence for apparently aren’t salacious enough to sate our appetite.

I just think it’s not helpful. If there are wolves attacking, it does no good to claim there are dragons. Then nobody will believe even the wolves are real

They were eating people too? I thought Lemmy was better than Qanon

Yeah, there’s no evidence that any of these people were raping infants. This is dumb

Oh shit! Autocorrect

It’s funny that it still kind of made sense

I was told once that very obese people sometimes have trouble wiping thoroughly without getting it on their hands. If this happens to a person who also doesn’t care about the next visitor, they might just wipe their hand on the wall out of convenience and/or frustration. This explains the shit you sometimes find smeared on the walls in public stalls.

That alien doesn’t even have a numeral for 4, so it wouldn’t have a word for it either. If it speaks English, uses base 4, and uses the same words we do for numbers, it would sound like this when counting rocks: “One, two, three, ten, eleven, twelve, thirteen, twenty…”. But when it says “twelve”, it means the same thing as when we say “six”.

The joke: In any base X, the Xth number is always the first number to require a second digit. Base 4 goes 1,2,3,10,11,12,13,20,21,etc. Base 7 goes 1,2,3,4,5,6,10,etc.