I don’t necessarily believe it’s in good faith. Just pointing out that it could be a simple misunderstanding and added back.
They can quietly drop or add anything internally, or just be inconsistent. They don’t even have to have a public policy. So the words don’t mean much to begin with. Once there are examples of no enforcement is when it becomes a serious issue.
A YouTube spokesperson said that the removal of “gender identity and expression” from the hate speech policy was part of regular copy edits to the website, and that the enforcement of the policy hasn’t changed. Hate speech toward someone over their “sex, gender, or sexual orientation” is still barred, however critics say that “gender” is very different than “gender identity and expression.”
If this is a good faith statement it’s a non-issue IMO
Good reminder of this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0YW7x9U5TQ
Ukraine losing would be terrible for Trump. It makes him look weak and bad at foreign policy. Everyone knows that Russia invaded Ukraine unprovoked, and they’ll do it again
China is pro-Palestinian, so it’s still directly related
(the) Gnorp Apologue (link)
For reference, the text is coming from the <title> tag in the HTML, which can differ from the displayed title at the opt of the article. It’s likely different for SEO/clickthrough purposes
I guess it depends on how the word is used. I think of obsession as strictly a personal thing, and almost everyone I know wants 0 or 1 car because it’s difficult to get around without it. I’d consider that practical instead on excessive. Though I guess you could argue wanting your one car to be bigger or more expensive is excessive
Don’t get me wrong, the culture definitely favors cars over pedestrians. I just don’t think I’d use the word obsessive to represent that relationship
Edit: spelling
That’s a pretty ridiculous headline imo
I don’t understand this. Small brained users rise up
They’re can still play a part of the war machine. Being physically within Russia makes it easier for the government to apply pressure for economic and reputational support
I listened to an interview recently, I believe on BBC, where the interviewee said the biggest issue with peace talks is that the international community isn’t able to trust Putin to keep his word on whatever is agreed upon. I hadn’t considered that, but it makes a lot of sense and I’m not sure how that could change
Please clap
Article: https://www.polygon.com/23688170/gary-bowser-hacker-nintendo-released-restitution
In this interview he claims he was simply paid to develop like a contractor and the people running the business still haven’t faced consequences: https://darknetdiaries.com/episode/136/
I played high-end games I couldn’t otherwise play, often at a discount, and then they refunded me at the end anyway. Pretty sweet deal
Flagging things like that usually leads to their removal
I’m not sure what specifically you’re referring to, but algorithms are, generally speaking, code. You can purchase a company and their code.
What assessment?
HP printers are amazing compared to Epson
Perhaps Teams has changed, but in the past I personally found it more efficient for text communication because it forced everything to be a thread. With Slack there’s too much variety (messages & threads in channels, direct messages, huddles, canvases) which consistently leads to visibility and findability issues since everyone uses it differently. Though I understand technically they’re very similar and the emphasis is mostly visual