Is this not at all stochastic, or do I just not know what stochastic means?
it would be clearer to say that it is stochastically accurate
This but AI
Warning: unused variable
Just add it to the pile I guess
I’ve had managers who follow that exact algorithm.
I’m confused, shouldn’t this be printing false no matter what the input is?
that’s the joke, since most numbers aren’t prime, this function is technically highly accurate despite being completely useless.
The test suite probably looks something like this:
int tests_passed=0; int tests_failed=0; for(int i=0;i<100000;i++){ printf("test no. %d: ", i); if(is_prime(i)==actually_is_prime(i)){ printf("passed\n"); tests_passed++; }else{ printf("failed\n"); tests_failed++; } } //...Removed by mod
Removed by mod
The test suite probably looks something like this:
int tests_passed=0; int tests_failed=0; for(int i=0;i<100000;i++){ printf("test no. %d: ", i); if(is_prime(i)==actually_is_prime(i)){ printf("passed\n"); tests_passed++; }else{ printf("failed\n"); tests_failed++; } } //...It approaches 100% accuracy
95.121% of the time it works everytime.
You could simplify it even further by removing the int x parameter of the function…
So elegant! This is too valuable for GitHub, sell this directly to the Saudi government.
I am screenshoting this so it will be screenshot of a screenshot of a screenshot then post it somewhere else
ifunny
Not even adding some watermark? smh
But when the input is all prime numbers then the accuracy is 0.
True
also btw icymi, this is a post about LLMs
But cryptography…
