• potpie@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      105
      ·
      1 year ago

      Pay billions for a userbase, then drive away the ones that aren’t Nazis or bots.

      • MeetInPotatoes@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Been saying it for a while, but his plan was to run it into the ground all along. Who is he buddy-buddy with in public? The Saudi’s and the Russians, who both have an interest in seeing Twitter burn to the ground. He started by laying off people, not paying their bills, and making stupid brand decisions. This has been the plan all along and there’s really no other logical explanation. 44 billion is nothing to the Saudis and Russian oligarchs if it takes away a key tool for organized dissent and the spread of western ideals.

    • Landrin201@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Pay 54 billion dollars to utterly destroy a platform which gave normal people the ability to effectively spread information about the wrongdoing of the upper class, and which often promoted that very information.

      That’s why he did this, he knows it’s killing g Twitter and wants it dead.

    • MagicShel@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lessons for whom? I have several things I would like to kill but lack the requisite trillions to execute my vision.

        • z3n0x@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          “Tired of running your massively popular online service? Call BrandWreckers™ , your one-stop shop for dismantling user loyalty and brand reputation. Call now and lose your first 10k users for free!”

        • MagicShel@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You know I wonder if we could create a non profit that exists only to buy things and then donate them (IP, closed source, whatever) to the public domain. If you had a savvy board, such an organization could do a lot of good.

          Something like this must already exist, right?

            • MagicShel@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I mean they would need to be paid, but idk about a percentage. Mostly just to fairly compensate them for the time spent vetting deals.

              • jarfil@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                What’s savvy about getting paid just for your time? You need to get paid for expertise, opportunities, networking… that’s at least 10%, since a non-profit wouldn’t have preference shares.

                • MagicShel@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I’m leery about a percentage just because I perceive a conflict of interest. Overall compensation of 10% might be about right, but tying actual compensation to the cost of stuff that is bought creates a perverse incentive to overspend on things. That’s money donated for the betterment of humanity, not so I can have a 3 acre swimming pool.

                  But IDK maybe I’m looking at it wrong.

    • Leafeytea@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      You can throw Warner Brothers Discovery in there while you are at it (HBO now stupidly referred to as “Max”)

      • Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I just saw a trailer for an adventure time spin off on a youtube channel called “Max” and though it was a random channel that post trailer lol. Granted i rarely watch anything and while i know about HBO i don’t ever remember watching anything from them.

      • shiveyarbles@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I get the feeling that these execs need a plan to increase profits every quarter, and this is one of the gotos.

    • The Cuuuuube@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      1 year ago

      He’s a stunted 8 year old who associates X with edginess. X factor. X Men. X Ray. X rated films. XXX. All super fucking cool

      • Chahk@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        He originally wanted “Model 3” to be called “Model E” so that the three (at the time) Tesla models could spell out “SEX”. Fortunately that name was already taken. He’s a petulant child.

        • CraigeryTheKid@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ll admit, BACK THEN, I thought it was funny and was sad E was taken. But yeah perspective changes when you realize how much worse he is/was/will be.

      • Uniquitous@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Also, he’s an unoriginal dipshit. All he’s good at is buying things and slapping his name on 'em, he’s never had an idea of his own.

  • davehtaylor@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    All I can think of when he talks about how “X will be an app for everything” is:

    Welcome to Zombocom, you can do anything at Zombocom, Welcome to you. Anything is possible at Zombocom. The infinite is possible at Zombocom. The unobtainable is unknown at Zombocom. Welcome to Zombocom.

  • Hexorg@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    What was that about him doing twitter’s technology policing and leaving running the company to the new CEO?

  • Snapz@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Only clearer by the day that this was all an exercise to intentionally kill Twitter to the benefit of billionaires, fascists and other extremists.

    Twitter existed as a relatively free and open public space to communicate, organize and assemble to take actions for and against things at scale before musk (e.g. The Arab Spring, a terrifying moment for the Saudis especially - the second largest shareholder behind musk).

    When people collectively laughed at elon and his cringe, inbred, emerald boy antics or his humiliating divorce and other routine failures, Twitter was the bullhorn.

    Now elon and his desperate far right Toadies will work to try to rewrite reality so they can eventually have this conversation:

    "Twitter? What’s a Twitter? Wait, are you talking about blork? A bird? No, blork’s logo is a dinosaur with chainsaw arms… and everyone wants to be his best friend… and it’s against the law to divorce him… and he’s cool… and…"

    What an everlasting tool history will remember you as, elon. If they remember you at all, it will be to laugh at you - you’ll never outrun that.

    • Saganaki@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t attribute to malice what is absolutely just idiocy. Musk is not some genius. He is quite literally a man-child who made money because he came from money (and maybe a little luck).

      His hubris led to this disaster with twitter—nothing else.

  • patchymoose@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    It must be incredibly frustrating to be the new CEO that he just appointed, only to have him continuing to run his mouth and make ruinous decisions that tie your hands.

  • Oro [she/they]@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ironic how he chose an X in a strikingly similar style to the (old, unmaintained, and deprecated) Xorg. That was certainly a choice of all time.

    • jarfil@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      X.org - stable release 29 March 2023

      You may be thinking of XFree86 (est. 1991) or X11 (est. 1984).

      • Oro [she/they]@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, I’m thinking of Xorg. The development on it has slowed to less than a crawl, and not because it’s feature-complete. It’s unmaintainable, and hell to manage for anyone that’s not a senior Xorg developer.

        • jarfil@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          What features is it missing? They started decoupling GPU drivers from the X server a long time ago (about a decade), that’s why Linux has DRM, and what enabled making Wayland. At this point the only feature needed of Xorg, is a compatibility layer between X clients and Wayland.

  • Canadian Nomad@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Don’t you know? The bird’s aren’t real!

    They are really drone replicas installed by the U.S. government to spy on Americans!

    • Eavolution@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sorry to break the illusion, but BIRD is an acronym. British Intelligence Recording Device.

      Rule Britannia.

      • chaogomu@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        While that acronym is true, the British don’t actually operate that many BIRDs, they mostly manufacture them and export to other countries.

        I hear that almost 2/3rds of British manufacturing is devoted to BIRDs that are earmarked for foreign government use.

        • mobyduck648@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah unfortunately for MI5 the reintroduction of red kites across much of the UK has rendered them less effective with attacks being common. They also mostly use the BBC Radio 4 longwave transmitter to navigate and that’s being shut down next year along with the rest of the BBC’s AM output so they’re developing an alternative called SEAGULL: Self-Extracting Audio Guided by Ultra-Light Links where residential and commercial WiFi networks are hijacked to guide the mechanical avians instead of the centralised transmitter system. This system has its detractors however and occasionally they’ve locked onto train WiFi and immediately failed.

          They were originally going to use mechanical geese for this task but political interference meant that seagulls were used instead so that the rapid decline of the fish and chip industry isn’t blamed on Tory economic policy. Unfortunately people are rightly suspicious of seagulls and this has thus far limited the success of operation SEAGULL. The authorities are hoping that operation ‘drop several hundred kilograms of LSD into a reservoir on the basis it’s not even the worst pollution Thames Water are up to that day’ will improve matters.