• Alsephina@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      The bubble already burst back in 2021 iirc when the company defaulted on its debt and the CPC refused to bail them out (based).

      • novibe@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        And people still talk about the “China real estate collapse” lmao

        • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          9 months ago

          Just because the CCP are experts at sweeping things under the rug doesn’t mean it’s not happening.

          • Alsephina@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            9 months ago

            You realize it’s basically impossible to disprove something right? Burden of proof etc etc

            Evergrande’s collapse has been very well documented and is well-known, nothing’s being “swept under the rug” here. It’s in line with Xi Jinping’s "Housing Should Be for Living In, Not for Speculation" policies too

            Also, obligatory China home ownership graph; reached 90% in 2018.

            Idk about you but I think the people who’ve done this prolly know what they’re doing. Ig we’ll see how this affects China’s housing in the coming years.

            • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              If Chinese companies work anything like American companies the fact that they have been floating all this time without being checked by creditors is amazing in of itself and just goes to show that they are being artificially propped up either by government, amicable law or both.

              • Alsephina@lemmy.mlOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Corporations and economies are all man-made in the first place; it’s all “artificial”.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The liquidation order is likely to impact China’s financial system, even as authorities try to prevent a selloff in the Chinese stock market.

    Evergrande had been granted a brief reprieve in December after it said it was attempting to “refine” a new debt restructuring plan of more than $300 billion in liabilities.

    Fergus Saurin, a lawyer representing an ad hoc group of creditors, said Monday he was not surprised by the outcome.

    The judge is expected to provide more reasons for the liquidation order during a separate court session Monday afternoon.

    Real estate drove China’s economic boom, but developers borrowed heavily as they turned cities into forests of apartment and office towers.

    That has helped to push total corporate, government and household debt to the equivalent of more than 300% of annual economic output, unusually high for a middle-income country.


    The original article contains 418 words, the summary contains 140 words. Saved 67%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    9 months ago

    So, the real estate market in China was over leveraged just - like it’s been over leveraged in many other countries. Will be interesting to see how their c̶o̶n̶ ̶a̶r̶t̶i̶s̶t̶s̶, I mean their economists attempt to correct for it. Chances are, if it’s happening there it’ll start a domino effect on other over leveraged real estate markets.

    • Thrashy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      Hard to say. Real estate has been weird in China for years since it’s one of the few investment vehicles available to the masses. A collapse domestically could even push those with the ability to do so to move more of their money into overseas real estate, which could have the opposite effect. Regardless, it’s a bad sign for the Chinese economy generally, especially given that Evergrande is only the first of what’s likely to be a wave of real estate industry bankruptcies.

      • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Was just going to say this. This will just shift money away from Chinese RE, probably into RE in the West.

        • khannie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          I think they have fairly strict monetary controls to prevent that.

          I spent a decent amount of time in China before COVID and the amount of semi finished husks of buildings was alarming. They definitely over-built and the piper is finally getting paid it looks like.

    • u_tamtam@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      Not like “many other countries” but expectedly much worse: real estate has been de facto where most Chinese have been concentrating their wealth as “investment” in the absence of better local alternatives and the inability to invest abroad.

      • nekandro@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        How much money, exactly, do you think is in the US property market?

        How much money, specifically, from the middle class?

        • u_tamtam@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          The important figure isn’t the total, but the fraction of GDP that goes into real estate, which is disproportionate in the case of China, for the reasons I mentioned, and more (another major one being the land leased by local governments to serve as their de facto revenue stream)